Nº. 1 of  8

The Green State

I don't believe in the red state or the blue state.

This blog is run by an american who lives in scotland.

this blog loves: choice, atheism, universal healthcare, the american green party, the scottish national party, and puppies.

this blog dislikes: free market libertarianism, anti-choice propaganda, religion, and people who ask annoying questions for no apparent reason

Questions, comments, concerns? greenstate.tumblr.com/ask

Posts tagged healthcare:

On Friday, the International Federation of Health Plans — a global insurance trade association that includes more than 100 insurers in 25 countries — released more direct evidence. It surveyed its members on the prices paid for 23 medical services and products in different countries, asking after everything from a routine doctor’s visit to a dose of Lipitor to coronary bypass surgery. And in 22 of 23 cases, Americans are paying higher prices than residents of other developed countries. Usually, we’re paying quite a bit more. The exception is cataract surgery, which appears to be costlier in Switzerland, though cheaper everywhere else.

Prices don’t explain all of the difference between America and other countries. But they do explain a big chunk of it. The question, of course, is why Americans pay such high prices — and why we haven’t done anything about it.

“Other countries negotiate very aggressively with the providers and set rates that are much lower than we do,” Anderson says. They do this in one of two ways. In countries such as Canada and Britain, prices are set by the government. In others, such as Germany and Japan, they’re set by providers and insurers sitting in a room and coming to an agreement, with the government stepping in to set prices if they fail.

In America, Medicare and Medicaid negotiate prices on behalf of their tens of millions of members and, not coincidentally, purchase care at a substantial markdown from the commercial average. But outside that, it’s a free-for-all. Providers largely charge what they can get away with, often offering different prices to different insurers, and an even higher price to the uninsured.

[…]

“In my view, health is a business in the United States in quite a different way than it is elsewhere,” says Tom Sackville, who served in Margaret Thatcher’s government and now directs the IFHP. “It’s very much something people make money out of. There isn’t too much embarrassment about that compared to Europe and elsewhere.”

The result is that, unlike in other countries, sellers of health-care services in America have considerable power to set prices, and so they set them quite high. Two of the five most profitable industries in the United States — the pharmaceuticals industry and the medical device industry — sell health care. With margins of almost 20 percent, they beat out even the financial sector for sheer profitability.

The players sitting across the table from them — the health insurers — are not so profitable. In 2009, their profit margins were a mere 2.2 percent. That’s a signal that the sellers have the upper hand over the buyers.

This is a good deal for residents of other countries, as our high spending makes medical innovations more profitable. “We end up with the benefits of your investment,” Sackville says. “You’re subsidizing the rest of the world by doing the front-end research.”

But many researchers are skeptical that this is an effective way to fund medical innovation. “We pay twice as much for brand-name drugs as most other industrialized countries,” Anderson says. “But the drug companies spend only 12 percent of their revenues on innovation. So yes, some of that money goes to innovation, but only 12 percent of it.”

one thing i liked about this article was that they came right out and said it: the new healthcare laws did nothing about price. it goes on to try and explain that fact away in some form, but the fact remains. your country doesn’t really care about you. sorry, friends. 

healthcare

i have been reading ‘libertarian’ posts about why healthcare can be solved by the free market. or rather, why free-market libertarian ron paul supporters believe that america’s healthcare problem can be solved hypothetically by their idea of the free market. 

over the summer, i posted a lot of links about healthcare. specifically, about why free market principles do not apply to healthcare. today, i am going to gather together some of the ones i really enjoyed and put them all here for you. i think it’s important to have this information, and for this information to make its way to the surface of this blog every so often. never forget, AMIRITE?

  1. Why the Markets Can’t Cure Healthcare
  2. Healthcare is not a Commodity for Comparison Shopping
  3. Six Reasons Why Healthcare is not a Commodity
  4. Editorial: Because Healthcare is Such a Unique Transaction, Free Market Rules Often Don’t Apply
  5. The Free Market Does Not Work in Healthcare
  6. Healthcare is Not a Widget
  7. Free Market Rules Don’t Work in Delivering Healthcare

when talking about healthcare, we’re talking about people as commodities, really. and healthcare is something that we all need. it’s not a car, it’s our bodies. the problem with allowing competition between providers is that people get left behind in this equation. a hospital can buy new equipment to corner the market and provide more procedure-oriented care, but this will drive up the cost of those procedures to pay for the equipment and it will cause more doctors to order tests and procedures that are unnecessary. we already see that, and under a completely deregulated system, what proof do we have that it would get better and not worse?

another problem is that when competition drives providers, they are spending tons of money on things like advertising. they want you to know that they exist. my father-in-law is a higher-up at a hospital, and they spend millions on advertising every year. billboards, water bottles, t-shirts, photo albums, backpacks, hats, lanyards, you name it and i’ve seen it at the thrift store with the hospital’s logo on it. by peddling useless crap and hoping to gain some sort of name recognition, they have sunken millions into something frivolous instead of spending millions on, for example, providing care to the community. there will always be people who cannot afford private insurance, and the free market does not fix this. 

the idea of the free market may be nice to some, but the reality is a greedy, cherry-picking monster that denies people care based on things beyond their control. 

have you ever avoided care because of the cost?

have you ever avoided care because of the cost?

links round-up: single-payer healthcare articles

i haven’t done a links post in a long time [so long that i can’t even remember when the last one was], so i thought that for your saturday, perhaps you’d like to read some of the newest articles posted to pnhp.org recently.

1.  NOW Conference Condemns War on Women, Calls for Better Social Security Benefits and “Medicare for All”

2. Universal Health Care: Can We Afford Anything Less?

3. Healthcare for all is Christian and practical, physician says

4. Doctors aren’t accepting new patients with private insurance either

5. Nurses union supports equal access for all

6. British fear ‘American-style’ healthcare system


stuffsickpeoplehavetoputupwith:

In a week when the Republicans attacked Planned Parenthood, the freedom of workers to bargain for a better life, programs that help middle class families and a whole lot more, the one thing they didn’t challenge was the excessive profits of the health insurance industry.

In fact, they continued their relentless effort to undermine the Affordable Care Act, which will eliminate the worst of insurance company abuses (like arbitrary denials of our care) and put a check on out-of-control profits that fuel rising premiums that are crushing families and small businesses.

Yesterday Health Care for America Now released a report that shows that the big five insurers earned $11.7 billion in 2010 - a 51% increase since 2008 - as they cut the number of people insured by millions and reduced the share of premiums they spend on actual medical care. So they made more money by charging more and providing less. It’s a great business model if you can swing it - sell a product for higher and higher prices, offer less and then try to deny services to your paying customers when they actually need it.

The big profit gains were led by UnitedHealth, which reported $4.6 billion in earnings last year, up 21 percent from the 2009. WellPoint, the parent of Blue Cross plans in 14 states, including New York, California, Virginia, Georgia, Missouri and Ohio, earned $2.9 billion, up 13 percent from 2009; Aetna made $1.8 billion, up 38 percent; Cigna recorded $1.3 billion, up 3 percent; and Humana took $1 billion, up 6 percent.

Unsurprisingly, the health insurance industry trade group didn’t like our report. Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, described our conclusions as “misleading attacks … motivated by an unpopular ideological agenda that seeks to destroy an important industry and turn the entire system over to Washington.”

Wow. That’s a tad hyperbolic, and it’s not true. But it’s hard to like an industry that makes money by avoiding risk and providing less care, and that is one of the largest political sponsors of congressional Republicans and spends millions to protect its uncontrolled ability to make unlimited profits.

According a report by Public Campaign Action Fund, these five companies alone spent nearly $50 million lobbying lawmakers from 2008 to 2010, and their employees and political action committees spent more than $7.3 million on campaign contributions. Imagine what the rest of their industry spent!

Of course it’s no shock that America’s big insurance companies make huge amounts of money and then spend millions to own the Republican Party, which then protects their ability to make excessive profits and pay bloated CEO salaries. This is exactly why the consumer protections in the Affordable Care Act are so important. And it’s what’s wrong with a political system dominated by corporate money instead of people.

To see the profits report from Health Care for America Now, go to: http://www.healthcareforamericanow.org/ins-co-2010-profits.

FISCAL AUSTERITY, Y’ALL. IT’S JUST LIKE THE REPUBLICANS SAY: WE **ALL** HAVE TO MAKE SACRIFICES, AMIRITE?

(via stuffsickpeoplehavetoputupwith-)

Defunding Planned Parenthood to prevent abortions is a lot like outlawing umbrellas to prevent rain.

—Milwaukee Journal Sentinel editorial board. (via mandington)

(via callmeclinton)

Hey, I saw your post asking for healthcare stories and I'd like to submit one -- email address, please? asked by midnightbeliever

i went to leave it in your ask box but you don’t have one. i’m not posting my personal email address on the internet. so, however you’d like to do this, let’s do it. 

my friend josh and i run a zine. it is usually not political, it’s an art/lit mag. but right now, we are putting together a special edition about healthcare, and we want your stories. all you need to do is tell us about your experience with the american healthcare system. a lot of you have written me before, and if you have, feel free to send me your story again. if you’re interested, message me and i will give you my email address for you to send your story directly to me. 
this issue is really a jumping-off point for us, we’re hoping to shop this idea around to some publishers. it could go somewhere as a book. it may not. but the topic is relevant, and i have a sage mentor who thinks i have good ideas. so we’re just going to see where this goes. i hope you’d like to be part of it, whatever it ends up being.
i look forward to hearing from you!

my friend josh and i run a zine. it is usually not political, it’s an art/lit mag. but right now, we are putting together a special edition about healthcare, and we want your stories. all you need to do is tell us about your experience with the american healthcare system. a lot of you have written me before, and if you have, feel free to send me your story again. if you’re interested, message me and i will give you my email address for you to send your story directly to me. 

this issue is really a jumping-off point for us, we’re hoping to shop this idea around to some publishers. it could go somewhere as a book. it may not. but the topic is relevant, and i have a sage mentor who thinks i have good ideas. so we’re just going to see where this goes. i hope you’d like to be part of it, whatever it ends up being.

i look forward to hearing from you!

If the Republicans can put forth a series of reforms that get everyone covered in some form and control costs, wonderful.

One would think, however, if they had such a plan it would have been on the table by now – or for that matter, when the GOP controlled the White House and Congress.

Free markets work great for buying cars. But let’s not pretend they will solve problems to which – by choice as a compassionate nation – we do not and cannot allow free-market rules to apply.

As the Miami Herald recently reported, insurers deny coverage for patients with “diabetes, hepatitis C, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, quadriplegia, Parkinson’s disease and AIDS/HIV.” Moreover, “some insurers will automatically reject applicants who are using certain prescription drugs. Wellpoint denies anyone who within the past year has takenAbilify and Zyprexa for mental disorders as well as Neupogen, which is used to treat the side effects of chemotherapy. Vista lists the anticoagulant Warfarin and the pain medication Oxycontin. Both companies list insulin.”

And why not? Competition without meaningful regulations incentivizes companies to only offer insurance to the healthiest Americans. How else could they beat the insurer across the street? Offering coverage to sicker Americans would attract a sicker pool of enrollees and serve as a competitive disadvantage. In fact, free market health care fits the definition of a failed market. A market fails if:

1. Monopoly — occurs if a single buyer or seller can exert significant influence over prices or output: In health care, “insurer and hospital markets areincreasingly dominated by large insurers and provider systems.” “The increased concentration has made it difficult for the nation to reap the benefits usually associated with competitive markets.”

2. Negative Externalities — occur if the market does not take into account the impact of an economic activity on outsiders: In the ‘wild west’ environment of the individual health market place, companies leave the sickest patients without coverage. Health care costs increase for everyone when patients are forced to forgo early and appropriate care or visit the emergency room once a condition becomes unbearable.

3. Asymmetric Information — occurs when one party has more or better information than the other party: Americans looking for coverage in the individual market have no way of comparing different policies or rarely know what the plans actually cover.

Nº. 1 of  8